eprintid: 8296
rev_number: 2
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1
dir: disk0/00/00/82/96
datestamp: 2023-11-09 16:20:11
lastmod: 2023-11-09 16:20:11
status_changed: 2023-11-09 16:12:18
type: conference_item
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Hidayah, N.M.S.
creators_name: Liu, W.-W.
creators_name: Lai, C.-W.
creators_name: Noriman, N.Z.
creators_name: Khe, C.-S.
creators_name: Hashim, U.
creators_name: Lee, H.C.
title: Comparison on graphite, graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide: Synthesis and characterization
ispublished: pub
note: cited By 275; Conference of International Conference of Global Network for Innovative Technology and AWAM International Conference in Civil Engineering: Sustainable Technology and Practice for Infrastructure and Community Resilience, IGNITE-AICCE 2017 ; Conference Date: 8 August 2017 Through 9 August 2017; Conference Code:131245
abstract: Graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO) are known to have superior properties for various applications. This work compares the properties of GO and RGO with graphite. GO was prepared by using Improved Hummer's method whereas the produced GO was subjected to chemical reduction with the use of hydrazine hydrate. Graphite, GO and RGO had different morphologies, quality, functionalized groups, UV-Vis absorption peaks and crystallinity. With the removal of oxygen-containing functional group during reduction for RGO, the quality of samples was decreased due to higher intensity of D band than G band was seen in Raman results. In addition, platelet-like surface can be observed on the surface of graphite as compared to GO and RGO where wrinkled and layered flakes, and crumpled thin sheets were observed on GO and RGO surface respectively. Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR) analysis showed the presence of abundant oxygen-containing functional groups in GO as compared to RGO and graphite. The characteristic peaks at 26.62°, 9.03°and 24.10°for graphite, GO and RGO, respectively, can be detected from X-Ray diffraction (XRD). Furthermore, the reduction also caused red shift at 279nm from 238nm, as obtained from ultraviolet visible (UV-Vis) analysis. The results proved that GO was successfully oxidized from graphite whereas RGO was effectively reduced from GO. © 2017 Author(s).
date: 2017
publisher: American Institute of Physics Inc.
official_url: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85037634861&doi=10.1063%2f1.5005764&partnerID=40&md5=b5ffdf563fca1757d8e140539d5d1ddb
id_number: 10.1063/1.5005764
full_text_status: none
publication: AIP Conference Proceedings
volume: 1892
refereed: TRUE
isbn: 9780735415744
issn: 0094243X
citation:   Hidayah, N.M.S. and Liu, W.-W. and Lai, C.-W. and Noriman, N.Z. and Khe, C.-S. and Hashim, U. and Lee, H.C.  (2017) Comparison on graphite, graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide: Synthesis and characterization.  In: UNSPECIFIED.