@article{scholars7634,
           pages = {2176--2186},
         journal = {Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences},
       publisher = {Universiti Malaysia Pahang},
            year = {2016},
           title = {Effect of blending ratio on temperature profile and syngas composition of woody biomass co-gasification},
             doi = {10.15282/jmes.10.2.2016.20.0204},
          number = {2},
            note = {cited By 27},
          volume = {10},
          author = {Sulaiman, S. A. and Inayat, M. and Basri, H. and Guangul, F. M. and Atnaw, S. M.},
            issn = {22894659},
        abstract = {Co-gasification of biomass is beneficial as only relying on one type of biomass causes interruption in gasification if the feedstock supply is disrupted for any reason. Therefore, co-gasification of different biomass materials is a potential way to overcome the problem. In this work, co-gasification of wood chips (WC) and coconut fronds (CF) was carried out in a downdraft gasifier at 400 L/min airflow rate. Three blends of WC/CF of 70:30, 50:50 and 30:70 ratios were considered with a maximum particle size of 2.5-3.0 cm. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of blending ratio on the temperature profile and syngas composition produced by the co-gasification of WC/CF blended feedstock. The results show that the temperature profile and syngas composition of 70:30 WC/CF blend was comparatively better. The average syngas composition of 70:30 WC/CF blend during steady state co-gasification operation was 20, 12 and 3 for CO, H2 and CH4 respectively. Similarly, the average syngas composition of 50:50 WC/CF blend was around 21, 8 and 0.7 for CO, H2, and CH4 respectively. While the 30:70 WC/CF blend encountered with bridging problem due to fibrous and low density CF. No more than 50 of fibrous and low density feedstock like CF is recommended in a blend for stable and progressive co-gasification. {\^A}{\copyright} Universiti Malaysia Pahang.},
             url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85008704841&doi=10.15282\%2fjmes.10.2.2016.20.0204&partnerID=40&md5=c0d8a470d6a0a98b8ea87a867c3e6132}
}