@inproceedings{scholars6510,
           pages = {622--626},
       publisher = {Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.},
         journal = {2016 3rd International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences, ICCOINS 2016 - Proceedings},
           title = {Protocols for agent-based autonomous negotiations: A review},
            year = {2016},
             doi = {10.1109/ICCOINS.2016.7783287},
            note = {cited By 12; Conference of 3rd International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences, ICCOINS 2016 ; Conference Date: 15 August 2016 Through 17 August 2016; Conference Code:125433},
          author = {Adnan, M. H. M. and Hassan, M. F. and Aziz, I. and Paputungan, I. V.},
            isbn = {9781509051342},
             url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85010338190&doi=10.1109\%2fICCOINS.2016.7783287&partnerID=40&md5=52cd07891b2c3a59294cb102fb647b2e},
        keywords = {Agents; Information science; Network protocols, Autonomous; Autonomous negotiation; Concurrent; Information sharing; Negotiating agents; Negotiation; Negotiation protocol; Time efficiencies, Autonomous agents},
        abstract = {Autonomous negotiation needs certain protocol, a set of rules that defines the interaction boundaries between negotiating agents. This paper aims to allow readers, particularly agent-based autonomous negotiation designers to understand and differentiate various agent-based negotiation protocols. This paper reviews one-to-one, concurrent one-to-many and many-to-many negotiation protocols that are divided into general, Alternative-offers and auctions-based protocols. In total, 23 protocols are reviewed. Then, this paper discusses some limitations of current negotiation protocols. As a conclusion, there are several addressable issues arises in using the protocols in different domains. The protocols should meet negotiation objectives such as time efficiency, robustness, consistency and information sharing. {\^A}{\copyright} 2016 IEEE.}
}