TY  - JOUR
SN  - 03029743
EP  - 159
AV  - none
TI  - Load forecasting accuracy through combination of trimmed forecasts
SP  - 152
N1  - cited By 8; Conference of 19th International Conference on Neural Information Processing, ICONIP 2012 ; Conference Date: 12 November 2012 Through 15 November 2012; Conference Code:93816
Y1  - 2012///
VL  - 7663 L
JF  - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
A1  - Hassan, S.
A1  - Khosravi, A.
A1  - Jaafar, J.
A1  - Belhaouari, S.B.
UR  - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84869073326&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-642-34475-6_19&partnerID=40&md5=b93f193fa7575b6386e6bc4a3f1d7866
CY  - Doha
ID  - scholars2680
KW  - Approximation capabilities; forecast combination; Forecasting performance; Load demand; Load forecasting; Neural network model; Real world data; Short term load forecasting; Training process; trimmed mean
KW  -  Data processing; Electric load forecasting; Neural networks; Trimming
KW  -  Forecasting
N2  - Neural network (NN) models have been receiving considerable attention and a wide range of publications regarding short-term load forecasting have been reported in the literature. Their popularity is mainly due to their excellent learning and approximation capabilities. However, NN models suffer from the problem of forecasting performance fluctuations in different runs, due to their development and training processes. Averaging of forecasts generated by NNs has been proposed as a solution to this problem. However, this may lead to another problem as odd forecasts may significantly shift the mean resulting in large forecasting inaccuracies. This paper investigates application of a trimming method by removing the α largest and smallest forecasts and then averaging the rest of the forecasts. A validation set is applied for selecting the best trimming amount for NN load demand forecasts. Performance of the proposed method is examined using a real world data set. Demonstrated results show that although trimmed forecasts are not the best possible ones, they are better than forecasts generated by individual NN models in almost 70 of the cases. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.
IS  - PART 1
ER  -