eprintid: 19466
rev_number: 2
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1
dir: disk0/00/01/94/66
datestamp: 2024-06-04 14:11:55
lastmod: 2024-06-04 14:11:55
status_changed: 2024-06-04 14:05:46
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Ahmed, I.
creators_name: Ahmad, A.
creators_name: Abdul-Rani, A.M.
creators_name: Tasnim, N.
creators_name: Al-Amin, M.
title: A Comparative Review of Surface Modification Technique Between Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) and Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO) for Biomedical Applications
ispublished: pub
keywords: Biocompatibility; Corrosion resistance; Corrosion resistant coatings; Durability; Electrolysis; Implants (surgical); Medical applications; Morphology; Oxidation; Scanning electron microscopy; Zirconia, Bio implants; Biomedical applications; Heart valves; Orthopaedic implants; Physical vapour deposition; Plasma electrolytic oxidation; Plasma electrolytic oxidation coatings; Property; Surface modification techniques; Surgical instrument, Physical vapor deposition
note: cited By 0; Conference of 7th International Conference on Production, Energy and Reliability, ICPER 2020 ; Conference Date: 14 July 2020 Through 16 July 2020; Conference Code:284729
abstract: Whether the product is a surgical instrument, an orthopaedic implant or a heart valve, it is crucial to meet the criteria of hygiene, durability and protection that are extremely high.Nevertheless, it is quite unlikely for a metal to fully demonstrate all the desired properties.Recently, researchers have focused on coating bio-friendly materials over these tools in order to achieve desired durability and further ensure their safety and reliability.Among the numerous prevailing coating techniques, Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) and Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO) coating techniques attain most of the requirements which are desirable for bioimplants and medical instruments.The aim of this review is to show the constructive comparisons between PVD and PEO coatings based on their tribomechanical properties, corrosion resistance and antibacterial characteristics leading to compatibility in biomedical applications.These coatings have positive effects on the biocompatibility and tribological properties of implant surfaces.These coatings have been characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM), wear track morphology, potentiodynamic polarization test and antimicrobial tests. © 2023, Institute of Technology PETRONAS Sdn Bhd.
date: 2023
publisher: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
official_url: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85140801338&doi=10.1007%2f978-981-19-1939-8_61&partnerID=40&md5=b6bff7cd13617f9ddd2c5394decc8f1a
id_number: 10.1007/978-981-19-1939-8₆₁
full_text_status: none
publication: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering
pagerange: 813-829
refereed: TRUE
isbn: 9789811919381
issn: 21954356
citation:   Ahmed, I. and Ahmad, A. and Abdul-Rani, A.M. and Tasnim, N. and Al-Amin, M.  (2023) A Comparative Review of Surface Modification Technique Between Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) and Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO) for Biomedical Applications.  Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.  pp. 813-829.  ISSN 21954356