TY - JOUR Y1 - 2023/// EP - 19286 VL - 8 JF - ACS Omega A1 - Kathlyn, T.K. A1 - Zabiri, H. A1 - Aldrich, C. A1 - Liu, X. A1 - Mohd Amiruddin, A.A.A. UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85162824650&doi=10.1021%2facsomega.2c08109&partnerID=40&md5=7bebea565fad99f409c525292fcd11e0 AV - none ID - scholars18481 SP - 19273 TI - Fault Detection and Identification in an Acid Gas Removal Unit Using Deep Autoencoders N1 - cited By 2 N2 - An acid gas removal unit (AGRU) in a natural gas processing plant is designed specifically to remove acidic components, such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S), from the natural gas. The occurrence of faults, such as foaming, and to a lesser extent, damaged trays and fouling, in AGRUs is a commonly encountered problem; however, they are the least studied in the open literature. Hence, in this paper, shallow and deep sparse autoencoders with SoftMax layers are investigated to facilitate early detection of these three faults before any significant financial loss. The dynamic behavior of process variables in AGRUs in the presence of fault conditions was simulated using Aspen HYSYS Dynamics. The simulated data were used to compare five closely related fault diagnostic models, i.e., a model based on principal component analysis, a shallow sparse autoencoder without fine-tuning, a shallow sparse autoencoder with fine-tuning, a deep sparse autoencoder without fine-tuning, and a deep sparse autoencoder with fine-tuning. All models could distinguish reasonably well between the different fault conditions. The deep sparse autoencoder with fine-tuning was best able to do so with very high accuracy. Visualization of the autoencoder features yielded further insight into the performance of the models, as well as the dynamic behavior of the AGRU. Foaming was relatively difficult to distinguish from normal operating conditions. The features obtained from the fine-tuned deep autoencoder in particular can be used to construct bivariate scatter plots as a basis for automatic monitoring of the process. © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. IS - 22 ER -