eprintid: 18363
rev_number: 2
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1
dir: disk0/00/01/83/63
datestamp: 2024-06-04 14:10:34
lastmod: 2024-06-04 14:10:34
status_changed: 2024-06-04 14:02:54
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Salisu, S.
creators_name: Ruhaiyem, N.I.R.
creators_name: Eisa, T.A.E.
creators_name: Nasser, M.
creators_name: Saeed, F.
creators_name: Younis, H.A.
title: Motion Capture Technologies for Ergonomics: A Systematic Literature Review
ispublished: pub
keywords: adult; clinical decision making; connective tissue; controlled study; cost effectiveness analysis; diagnostic test accuracy study; ergonomics; female; health care; health care management; human; human activities; knee; law enforcement; machine learning; male; materials handling; Medline; outcome assessment; patient coding; practice guideline; range of motion; Review; Scopus; search engine; systematic review; treatment outcome; video game; virtual reality; Web of Science; work environment
note: cited By 6
abstract: Muscular skeletal disorder is a difficult challenge faced by the working population. Motion capture (MoCap) is used for recording the movement of people for clinical, ergonomic and rehabilitation solutions. However, knowledge barriers about these MoCap systems have made them difficult to use for many people. Despite this, no state-of-the-art literature review on MoCap systems for human clinical, rehabilitation and ergonomic analysis has been conducted. A medical diagnosis using AI applies machine learning algorithms and motion capture technologies to analyze patient data, enhancing diagnostic accuracy, enabling early disease detection and facilitating personalized treatment plans. It revolutionizes healthcare by harnessing the power of data-driven insights for improved patient outcomes and efficient clinical decision-making. The current review aimed to investigate: (i) the most used MoCap systems for clinical use, ergonomics and rehabilitation, (ii) their application and (iii) the target population. We used preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines for the review. Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were used to search for relevant published articles. The articles obtained were scrutinized by reading the abstracts and titles to determine their inclusion eligibility. Accordingly, articles with insufficient or irrelevant information were excluded from the screening. The search included studies published between 2013 and 2023 (including additional criteria). A total of 40 articles were eligible for review. The selected articles were further categorized in terms of the types of MoCap used, their application and the domain of the experiments. This review will serve as a guide for researchers and organizational management. © 2023 by the authors.
date: 2023
official_url: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85167653272&doi=10.3390%2fdiagnostics13152593&partnerID=40&md5=e6f2d38eaa768e0006407c03130ed9b1
id_number: 10.3390/diagnostics13152593
full_text_status: none
publication: Diagnostics
volume: 13
number: 15
refereed: TRUE
citation:   Salisu, S. and Ruhaiyem, N.I.R. and Eisa, T.A.E. and Nasser, M. and Saeed, F. and Younis, H.A.  (2023) Motion Capture Technologies for Ergonomics: A Systematic Literature Review.  Diagnostics, 13 (15).