eprintid: 17126
rev_number: 2
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1
dir: disk0/00/01/71/26
datestamp: 2023-12-19 03:23:34
lastmod: 2023-12-19 03:23:34
status_changed: 2023-12-19 03:07:30
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Bhayo, B.A.
creators_name: Al-Kayiem, H.H.
creators_name: Gilani, S.I.U.
creators_name: Khan, N.
creators_name: Kumar, D.
title: Energy management strategy of hybrid solar-hydro system with various probabilities of power supply loss
ispublished: pub
keywords: Electric batteries; Energy efficiency; Energy management; Energy management systems; Particle swarm optimization (PSO); Renewable energy resources, Cost of energies; Hybrid hydro solar; Hydro storage systems; Integrated solar PV; Levelized cost of energy; Levelized costs; Power supply loss; Probability of power supply loss; Rural electrification; Solar PVs, Probability, alternative energy; energy management; optimization; probability; solar power
note: cited By 10
abstract: An optimal energy management strategy is difficult for an efficient operation of hybrid renewable energy systems due to the instability of energy resources. The present study analyzes a hybrid PV-battery integrated with the pump-hydro-storage system (PHSS) utilizing the rainfall potential at various probabilities of power supply loss (PPSL). Two configurations have been studied. Configuration-1 is a PV-battery system, and Configuration-2 is a hybrid PV-battery-PHSS. PPSL are varied between 0.00 and 0.10 in steps of 0.02. The particle swarm optimization technique is used for size optimization based on the Levelized Cost of energy minimization. Configuration-1 and Configuration-2 at PPSL of 0.00 are highly oversized. Configuration-2, compared to Configuration-1, has less excess power due to the integration of PHSS. A decrease in the power supply reliability by just 2 has caused the decrease in the Levelized Cost of energy by about 31.3 for Configuration-1 and 28.8 for Configuration-2. The power system efficiency for Configuration-1 at PPSL of 0.00, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, and 0.10 is 34, 71, 77, 79, 80, and 80, respectively. However, for the Configuration-2, the power system efficiency compared to Configuration-1 at PPSL of 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, and 0.10 has increased by about 11.8, 2.8, 0.0, 1.3, 1.3, and 1.3, respectively. © 2022 International Solar Energy Society
date: 2022
publisher: Elsevier Ltd
official_url: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85123373319&doi=10.1016%2fj.solener.2022.01.043&partnerID=40&md5=ccdd86f9a0daa744606ad7727724c187
id_number: 10.1016/j.solener.2022.01.043
full_text_status: none
publication: Solar Energy
volume: 233
pagerange: 230-245
refereed: TRUE
issn: 0038092X
citation:   Bhayo, B.A. and Al-Kayiem, H.H. and Gilani, S.I.U. and Khan, N. and Kumar, D.  (2022) Energy management strategy of hybrid solar-hydro system with various probabilities of power supply loss.  Solar Energy, 233.  pp. 230-245.  ISSN 0038092X