TY  - JOUR
AV  - none
SP  - 870
PB  - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
EP  - 882
ID  - scholars15885
KW  - Bus terminals; Buses; Carbon footprint; Decision making; Efficiency; Global warming; Location; Offshore oil well production; Spatial variables measurement; Students; Surveys; Sustainable development
KW  -  Analytical Hierarchy Process; Campus sustainability; Environmental issues; Multi-criteria decision making; Public transportation; Public universities; Suitability analysis; Sustainable campus
KW  -  Bus transportation
TI  - Spatial analysis for sustainable campus transportation: A case study of utp
SN  - 23662557
N2  - There are lots of environmental issues happening around us such as global warming and air pollution caused by carbon footprint released by different modes of transportation. As public universities have their own community, many of them including Universiti Teknologi Petronas (UTP) approach sustainability in campus by providing public transportation. Because of large scale emission caused by the influence of private vehicles on campus, campus sustainability can be achieved if universities encourage students to use public transport. Thereby, reducing number of private vehicles on campus. Hence, to encourage students to use public transport, the efficiency and effectiveness of public transport need to be improved. Based on the questionnaires, non-strategic bus-stop location is the reason why UTP students did not use public transport in campus. Finding the strategic bus-stop location using spatial analysis is one of the ways to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of public transport. Therefore, the objectives of this research are to determine the optimal bus-stop locations using spatial analysis and to determine the sustainability of selected bus stop locations to ensure that bus-stop locations will be conducive for users and encourage the use of public transport. Site suitability analysis is one of spatial analysis technique which is the best option that is used to select the best site according the criteria that have been set. While Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) as Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) technique is used to determine relative importance of the conflicting criteria. Finally, the optimal bus-stop locations were identified and ranked based on their level of sustainability. © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021.
VL  - 132
JF  - Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering
A1  - Ayub, U.B.
A1  - Balogun, A.-L.B.
UR  - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85100797748&doi=10.1007%2f978-981-33-6311-3_99&partnerID=40&md5=9c4d4aba60011b15e8ddd7bd5572b9de
N1  - cited By 2; Conference of 6th International Conference on Civil, Offshore and Environmental Engineering, ICCOEE 2020 ; Conference Date: 13 July 2021 Through 15 July 2021; Conference Code:253689
Y1  - 2021///
ER  -