@article{scholars15769,
          volume = {139 LN},
            note = {cited By 1; Conference of 4th International Conference on Architecture and Civil Engineering, ICACE 2020 ; Conference Date: 19 August 2020 Through 19 August 2020; Conference Code:258479},
             doi = {10.1007/978-981-33-6560-5{$_1$}{$_4$}},
           title = {Square Steel Tube Impressed Current Corrosion Rate in Term of Linear Polarization Resistance (LPR) Method},
            year = {2021},
         journal = {Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering},
       publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH},
           pages = {123--130},
        keywords = {Cathodic protection; Corrosion rate; Laboratories; Polarization; Tubular steel structures, Engineering laboratories; Experimental test; Linear polarization; Linear polarization resistance; Method validations; Natural environments; Rate of corrosions; Square steel tube, Steel corrosion},
             url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85106153114&doi=10.1007\%2f978-981-33-6560-5\%5f14&partnerID=40&md5=fceaeb5869f5b6cea6bc840604d0e10a},
        abstract = {Most of the civil engineering laboratory experiment induces the rate of corrosion process based on current value Am/cm2 to represent the effect of corrosion, however this method has lack of quantifying the actual mass loss rate of steel in the natural environment. This paper presents the Linear Polarization Resistant (LPR) experimental test technique as supplementary method for supporting the impressed current method validation and result for square tubes with 3{\^A} mm thickness. The most important parameter of the current impressed method is the length of time required to run the test, size of the sample, and amount of current applied to achieve laboratory corrosion rate close to the natural rate. On the other hand, the linear polarization resistance (LPR) needed only 24 h to complete, and the result in this paper found correlation between the impressed current corrosion, to the LPR system in term of mass loss. Based on result of the tests, the mass loss of the impressed current can be validated by LPR mass loss yearly, which reveal the equivalent number of years needed to have natural corrosion as the same sample used in laboratory with accelerated impressed current method. {\^A}{\copyright} 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.},
            issn = {23662557},
          author = {Alraeeini, A. S. and Nikbakht, E. and Ismail, M. C.},
            isbn = {9789813365599}
}