@article{scholars12270, volume = {136}, note = {cited By 30}, doi = {10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.11.001}, title = {A comparison of long-term fouling performance by zirconia ceramic filter and cation exchange in microbial fuel cells}, year = {2019}, publisher = {Elsevier Ltd}, journal = {International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation}, pages = {63--70}, issn = {09648305}, author = {Daud, S. M. and Wan Daud, W. R. and Abu Bakar, M. H. and Kim, B. H. and Somalu, M. R. and Jahim, J. M. and Muchtar, A. and Ghasemi, M.}, abstract = {The long-term performance of non-ion selective separators, zirconia ceramic filter (ZCF) with a various pore size such as 0.14 {\^I}1/4m ZCF1, 150 kDa ZCF2 and 5 kDa ZCF3 were compared to commercial cation exchange membrane (CEM), Nafion 117 in microbial fuel cells. The ZCF3 generated the highest performance of 2800 {\^A}{$\pm$} 14.5 mWm{\^a}??2 (5.9 Am{\^a}??2) compared to CEM: 1800 {\^A}{$\pm$} 17.8 mWm{\^a}??2, 4.0 Am{\^a}??2. Meanwhile, the CEM exhibited maximum power decline during the reverse sweep (61.7) when analyzed using the bi-directional polarization method. The non-ion selective membranes displayed reduced in maximum power decline during the reverse sweep (ZCF1 50, ZCF2 40 and ZCF3 42.8). In addition, the ZCF3 showed the highest proton conductivity and water uptake, 0.863 {\~A}? 10{\^a}??1 Scm{\^a}??1 and 93.7 respectively, followed by ZCF2 (0.729 {\~A}? 10{\^a}??1 Scm{\^a}??1, 80.98), ZCF1 (0.624 {\~A}? 10{\^a}??1 Scm{\^a}??1, 73.99) and Nafion 117 (0.367 {\~A}? 10{\^a}??2 Scm{\^a}??1, 57.07). The ZCF3 appeared as an efficient material for electrochemical active bacteria, maintaining the high power of 1600 mWm{\^a}??2, compared to CEM: 600 mWm{\^a}??2 after eight months{\^a}?? operation under batch mode. The long-term operation of MFCs was affected by the reduction of power output, caused by the increase in the thickness of the biofilm. {\^A}{\copyright} 2018 Elsevier Ltd}, keywords = {Biofilms; Ceramic materials; Computational electromagnetics; Fuel filters; Hysteresis; Ion exchange; Microbial fuel cells; Polarization; Pore size; Positive ions; Zirconia, Bi-directional; Cation exchange membranes; Cation exchanges; Long term performance; Polarization method; Power out put; Selective separator; Zirconia ceramic, Ion selective membranes, biofilm; comparative study; electrical conductivity; filter; fouling; fuel cell; hysteresis; ion exchange; membrane; performance assessment; polarization; pore space; reduction; zircon}, url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85056222182&doi=10.1016\%2fj.ibiod.2018.11.001&partnerID=40&md5=602613a760b6b19d2353c38a20506ead} }