@article{scholars10942,
           title = {Regression and multivariate models for predicting particulate matter concentration level},
             doi = {10.1007/s11356-017-0407-2},
            note = {cited By 20},
          volume = {25},
          number = {1},
           pages = {283--289},
       publisher = {Springer Verlag},
         journal = {Environmental Science and Pollution Research},
            year = {2018},
            issn = {09441344},
          author = {Nazif, A. and Mohammed, N. I. and Malakahmad, A. and Abualqumboz, M. S.},
        keywords = {air quality; atmospheric modeling; atmospheric pollution; concentration (composition); human activity; particulate matter; prediction; regression analysis; seasonal variation; wind direction; wind velocity, Malaysia, air pollutant; air pollution; analysis; environmental monitoring; forecasting; human; Malaysia; multivariate analysis; particulate matter; procedures; regression analysis; season; statistical model; weather, Air Pollutants; Air Pollution; Environmental Monitoring; Forecasting; Humans; Linear Models; Malaysia; Multivariate Analysis; Particulate Matter; Regression Analysis; Seasons; Weather},
             url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85031419991&doi=10.1007\%2fs11356-017-0407-2&partnerID=40&md5=2ebc6364619c0d150844c58e03878e8b},
        abstract = {The devastating health effects of particulate matter (PM10) exposure by susceptible populace has made it necessary to evaluate PM10 pollution. Meteorological parameters and seasonal variation increases PM10 concentration levels, especially in areas that have multiple anthropogenic activities. Hence, stepwise regression (SR), multiple linear regression (MLR) and principal component regression (PCR) analyses were used to analyse daily average PM10 concentration levels. The analyses were carried out using daily average PM10 concentration, temperature, humidity, wind speed and wind direction data from 2006 to 2010. The data was from an industrial air quality monitoring station in Malaysia. The SR analysis established that meteorological parameters had less influence on PM10 concentration levels having coefficient of determination (R2) result from 23 to 29 based on seasoned and unseasoned analysis. While, the result of the prediction analysis showed that PCR models had a better R2 result than MLR methods. The results for the analyses based on both seasoned and unseasoned data established that MLR models had R2 result from 0.50 to 0.60. While, PCR models had R2 result from 0.66 to 0.89. In addition, the validation analysis using 2016 data also recognised that the PCR model outperformed the MLR model, with the PCR model for the seasoned analysis having the best result. These analyses will aid in achieving sustainable air quality management strategies. {\^A}{\copyright} 2017, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.}
}