A comparison of Recovery Methods of Rhamnolipids Produced by Pseudomonas Aeruginosa

Shah, M.U.H. and Sivapragasam, M. and Moniruzzaman, M. and Yusup, S.B. (2016) A comparison of Recovery Methods of Rhamnolipids Produced by Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. In: UNSPECIFIED.

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2....

Abstract

The high cost of downstream separation, isolation and purification of rhamnolipids are significantly high and this hampers its widespread utilization. Hence, practical and economically sound recovery methods are often sought after. This work focuses on assessing various recovery methods of rhamnolipid produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These methods include that of; acid precipitation, ammonium sulphate precipitation, zinc sulphate precipitation and solvent extraction. Among these methods organic solvent extraction was found to be the best recovery technique giving the highest yield (7.5 g/L) of biosurfactant, while acid precipitation yielded the least at 3.5 g/L. Biosurfactant was supplemented with 1 crude oil (TAPIS) as the carbon source. Emulsification index (E24) of rhamnolipids to TAPIS was 42. © 2016 The Authors.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Additional Information: cited By 36; Conference of 4th International Conference on Process Engineering and Advanced Materials, ICPEAM 2016 ; Conference Date: 15 August 2016 Through 17 August 2016; Conference Code:131138
Uncontrolled Keywords: Air pollution; Bacteria; Biomolecules; Carbon; Crude oil; Emulsification; Extraction; Lipids; Precipitation (meteorology); Process engineering; Recovery; Solvent extraction; Solvents; Sulfur compounds; Zinc, Acid precipitation; Ammonium sulphate; Bio surfactant; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Rhamnolipids, Surface active agents
Depositing User: Mr Ahmad Suhairi UTP
Date Deposited: 09 Nov 2023 16:19
Last Modified: 09 Nov 2023 16:19
URI: https://khub.utp.edu.my/scholars/id/eprint/7440

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item