Machine learning algorithm for ventilator mode selection, pressure and volume control

Anitha, T. and Gopu, G. and Arun Mozhi Devan, P. and Assaad, M. (2024) Machine learning algorithm for ventilator mode selection, pressure and volume control. PLoS ONE, 19 (3 Marc). ISSN 19326203

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2....

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation techniques are vital for preserving individuals with a serious condition lives in the prolonged hospitalization unit. Nevertheless, an imbalance amid the hospitalized people demands and the respiratory structure could cause to inconsistencies in the patient's inhalation. To tackle this problem, this study presents an Iterative Learning PID Controller (ILC-PID), a unique current cycle feedback type controller that helps in gaining the correct pressure and volume. The paper also offers a clear and complete examination of the primarily efficient neural approach for generating optimal inhalation strategies. Moreover, machine learning-based classifiers are used to evaluate the precision and performance of the ILC-PID controller. These classifiers able to forecast and choose the perfect type for various inhalation modes, eliminating the likelihood that patients will require mechanical ventilation. In pressure control, the suggested accurate neural categorization exhibited an average accuracy rate of 88.2 in continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mode and 91.7 in proportional assist ventilation (PAV) mode while comparing with the other classifiers like ensemble classifier has reduced accuracy rate of 69.5 in CPAP mode and also 71.7 in PAV mode. An average accuracy of 78.9 rate in other classifiers compared to neutral network in CPAP. The neural model had an typical range of 81.6 in CPAP mode and 84.59 in PAV mode for 20 cm H2O of volume created by the neural network classifier in the volume investigation. Compared to the other classifiers, an average of 72.17 was in CPAP mode, and 77.83 was in PAV mode in volume control. Different approaches, such as decision trees, optimizable Bayes trees, naive Bayes trees, nearest neighbour trees, and an ensemble of trees, were also evaluated regarding the accuracy by confusion matrix concept, training duration, specificity, sensitivity, and F1 score. Copyright: © 2024 Thilakar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: cited By 0
Uncontrolled Keywords: airway pressure; Article; artificial intelligence; artificial neural network; artificial ventilation; Bayesian learning; classifier; confusion matrix; continuous positive airway pressure; cross validation; decision tree; health care personnel; hospitalization; human; learning algorithm; length of stay; lung pressure; machine learning; nerve cell network; P wave; personalized medicine; predictive value; pressure; pressure controlled ventilation; proportional assist ventilation; receiver operating characteristic; sensitivity analysis; sensitivity and specificity; support vector machine; tidal volume; volume controlled ventilation
Depositing User: Mr Ahmad Suhairi UTP
Date Deposited: 04 Jun 2024 14:19
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2024 14:19
URI: https://khub.utp.edu.my/scholars/id/eprint/19829

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item