A comprehensive study on the impact of nano-silica and ground granulated blast furnace slag on high strength concrete characteristics: RSM modeling and optimization

Bheel, N. and Waqar, A. and Radu, D. and Benjeddou, O. and Alwetaishi, M. and Almujibah, H.R. (2024) A comprehensive study on the impact of nano-silica and ground granulated blast furnace slag on high strength concrete characteristics: RSM modeling and optimization. Structures, 62.

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2....

Abstract

In light of the global climate change crisis, the imperative to mitigate carbon emission sources is growing in significance. Cement is a notable contributor to greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) due to its industrial manufacturing process, which results in the release of 0.9 kg of GHG per kilogram produced. Therefore, to reduce GHG by using Ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) as a substitution for cement in high strength concrete (HSC). However, the use of nano silica (NS) as nanomaterial in HSC to improve the mechanical and durability characteristics of HSC. Besides, Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was adopted to assess the workability test (slump), compressive strength (CS), splitting tensile strength (STS), flexural strength (FS), modulus of elasticity and water absorption (WA) of HSC blended with 5�20 of GGBFS with an 5 increment and 1�4 of NS with an 1 increment as nanomaterial. CS outcomes were obtained at 7 days, 28 days, 90 days while STS, FS, MOE, and WA assessments were observed at 28 days. From experimental outcomes, Slump and WA were found to be reduced with the addition of GGBFS and NS rises in HSC. Moreover, the highest CS, STS, FS, and MOE were observed by 91.78 MPa, 5.25 MPa, 5.05 MPa, 46.06 GPa at 10 of GGBFS and 3 of NS together in HSC at 28 days respectively. Additionally, the embodied carbon was found to be decreasing with the addition of GGBFS and NS increases in HSC. Furthermore, response prediction models were developed and verified using ANOVA with a significance level of 95. The R-Square values for the models ranged from 93 to 99.50. It has been concluded that the use of 10 of GGBFS as replacement for cement and 3 of NS together in HSC is providing optimum outcomes therefore, it is recommended for construction industry. © 2024 The Authors

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: cited By 1
Uncontrolled Keywords: Blast furnaces; Carbon; Cements; Climate change; Compressive strength; Construction industry; Gas emissions; Greenhouse gases; High performance concrete; Industrial emissions; Silica; Slags; Tensile strength, Global climate changes; Greenhouse gas emissions; Ground granulated blast furnace slag; High strength concretes; Modeling and optimization; Nanao-silicum; Nano Silica; Response surface methodology modeling and optimization; Response-surface methodology; Splitting-tensile strengths, Water absorption
Depositing User: Mr Ahmad Suhairi UTP
Date Deposited: 04 Jun 2024 14:19
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2024 14:19
URI: https://khub.utp.edu.my/scholars/id/eprint/19751

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item